This look at the pro-se world focuses on a burning theory among pro-se lunatics: the complete denial of jurisdiction over everything, because the courts can only exercise the jurisdiction of the Admiralty. Apparently, the entire legal system – down to the maritime architecture of the courtroom and the fringes on the flags in the courtroom – is an elaborate ploy of gubment, working with lawyers, to get people to accept the jurisdiction of the Admiralty. The golden flag of the United States is the Admiralty or War Flag, Admiralty or martial law. Administration officials and judges strictly oppose requests to remove the gold-fringed flag and replace it with the constitutional flag of the United States, as defined in Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Title 4 of the United States Code – which has NO fringes. “Flags displayed in state and U.S. courts have gold or yellow fringes. It is your warning that you are entering a foreign enclave, just as if you were entering a foreign embassy and you were under the jurisdiction of that flag. You may be wondering why there is a salamander lecturing you about the law. This is at the heart of the current bat theory – that all courts in the country are admiralty courts that sneak ashore. Like an amphibian. Got it? Our founders rejected the idea of Admiralty law as the rule of the land in this great nation, as stated in the Declaration and Decisions on Colonial Rights of the First Continental Congress of 1774 (emphasis added): Mint Center researchers discover gold-lined flag at Supreme Court “The golden fringed flag represents no nation and no constitution They are under the law of the Admiralty of the episcopal see – The Holy See of Rome” www.expose1933.com/3-gold-fringe-flag.html [2] United States v. Greenstreet, 912 F.

Supp. 224, 229 (Tex.D.1996) (rejecting the argument that a federal court is limited to the jurisdiction of the Admiralty because it flew a fringed flag). “The golden fringed flag is not the same flag approved for our constitutional republic in the U.S. Code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth colour (yellow) is not approved in the code. In addition, you will notice the cups hanging from the flag. These are also symbolic of the law of the Admiralty, which is the law of the sea” understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/gold-fringe-flag/ In addition, the edge or the eagle have no legal significance. Even if Mr.

McCann were to prove that a yellow fringe or a pole eagle transformed the flag of the United States State Court into a naval war flag, the court cannot imagine how the display of a naval war flag could limit the state court`s jurisdiction to abduct his child. Jurisdiction is a matter of law, status and constitution, not child`s play in which a person`s power is amplified or diminished by the depiction of a magical talisman. [6] “that the Admiralty Court is the court in which the golden braid passes over the American flag, indicating that the court is under martial law or Admiralty law,” www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/master_file/martiallaw.htm McCann Br. in Opp`n to Defs. Greenway, Percy, Winslow and the word of DFS. (all capital letters in original; language in square brackets in original); see also McCann Br. in Opp`n to Defs. James Bickel and Russell, Brown, Bickel & Breckenridge`s Mot.

(identical language in the parts with negligible differences in the others). To make this point, Mr. McCann put a flag sticker on the first page of each of his motions, which appears to be the American peace flag, without the offensive border. Under this flag is the following title: [T]he following Acts of Parliament are violations and violations of settler rights; and that its abolition is essential to restore harmony between Britain and the American colonies, namely: Therefore, Mr. McCann`s claims against the defendants listed above must be dismissed because his factual predicate is legally incorrect. Even if the Army or Navy fly American flags surrounded by yellow fringes, the presence of yellow fringes does not necessarily make each of these flags a war flag. Far from it: In the words of the Adjutant General of the Army: “In the making of the flag, a fringe is not considered part of the flag and is without heraldic significance.” Op.Att`y Gen. 34 op. Att`y gen.

at 485. If the fringes attached to the flag have no heraldic significance, this is even more true for an eagle that adorns the mast. The claim that paper money is illegal has been consistently rejected. Congress exercised this power by delegation to the Federal Reserve System. 12 U.S.C. Section 411. Federal Reserve notes are legal tender for all debts, including taxes. 31 U.S.C.

Section 392 [now 31 U.S.C. § 5103]; Milam v. U.S. 524 F.2d 629 (9th Cir. 1974). The U.S. Constitution, Section 1, Section 10, “prohibits states from declaring anything other than gold or silver legal tender, but does not limit the power of Congress to declare what shall be legal tender for all debts.” U.S. v. Rifen, 577 F.2d 1111, 1112 (8th Cir. 1978).

Since Congress has done so, there can be no valid challenge to the legality of Federal Reserve notes. United States v. Anderson, 584 F.2d 369, 374 (10th Cir. 1978). It addresses conspiracy theories and blames the Federal Reserve system (of course!) and the use of capital letters on birth certificates as the basis for the adoption of the American legal system by the Admiralty Act. So maybe Obama was right that he never had a birth certificate, right? “Yes, conspiracy theories about flag fringes. The most important thing is that the margin refers to the law of war or admiralty – basically, that the Constitution does not apply in this area and that whoever is the authority figure in this place has the absolute rule. funflagfacts.com/2016/03/26/whats-up-with-gold-fringe-on-flags/ respondent Greenstreet`s response to the applicant`s application for summary judgment identifies this court as an “admiralty court”, without providing further details on its application. discuss. If his request for a preliminary ruling must be interpreted as a judicial remedy, his request is dismissed. Others have tried to convince the judiciary that the edge of a U.S.

flag designates an Admiralty court. Given that this Court has such a flag in its courtroom, the question is raised. The concept behind the theory that the proponent claims is that if a courtroom is decorated with a flag that happens to be aligned at the edges, such decoration indicates that the court falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Admiralty. To think that a fringed flag decorating the courtroom in any way limits the jurisdiction of this court is frivolous. Unfortunately for the defendant Greenstreet, the setting is not a determinant of jurisdiction. [4] The United States Code states that “the flag of the United States shall consist of thirteen horizontal stripes, alternating red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field”, 4 U.S.C. § 1, with one star for each additional state, 4 U.S.C. § 2. In the 1920s, Army Order 260-10 required troops to raise flags with yellow silk fringe on the ground.