CRT has its origins in the American civil rights movement of the 1970s and has since developed subcategories, transcending jurisdictional boundaries and integrating into aspects of international law. For example, Asian American Legal Scholarship, LatCrit (Latin America) and Critical Indigenous Legal Theory. Although CLS was widely included in the United States, it was heavily influenced by European philosophers such as Karl Marx, Max Weber, Max Horkheimer, Antonio Gramsci, and Michel Foucault. CLS drew heavily on legal realism, the school of legal thought that flourished in the 1920s and 1930s. Like CLS scholars, legal realists rebelled against the accepted legal theories of the time, calling on the legal field to pay more attention to the social context of the law. The specialized variant of the English language used by lawyers and jurists in legal documents is called Legal English. David Mellinkoff had stated in the book “The Language of Law” that legal English uses “distinctive words, meanings, phrases and expressions”. There is a difference between the modern language and the language of law; The vocabulary and conventions have been accumulated in the language of the law, compiled and maintained for decades. In this regard, “English”, which is used by lawyers, is considered “English” in everyday language. Legal English uses a special version of specific terms and linguistic patterns that govern the teaching of legal language. Words affect how an audience reacts to an argument.

Effective use of words is not feasible for everyone. When choosing our vocabulary, we need to use our critical thinking skills to find that the word we choose is correctly needed in that sentence. According to the Warph-Sapphire hypothesis, “words in a particular language help determine how people interpret events that occur.” There are three areas of language where critical thinking is most applicable, which are areas: The British movement for critical legal studies began around the same time as its American counterpart. However, he focused on a number of conferences held each year, including the Critical Legal Conference and the National Critical Lawyers Group. There are still a number of fault lines in the Community; Between theory and practice, between those who look at Marxism and those who have worked on deconstruction, between those who explicitly seek political engagement and those who work in aesthetics and ethics. “The process of identifying legal issues, determining relevant facts, and applying applicable law to arrive at a conclusion that answers the legal question that represents the problems. The lawyer must understand the audience for whom the document is prepared: the client, the supervising lawyer and other members of the legal team or court. A four-volume collection from 2011, edited by Costas Douzinas and Colin Perrin with the support of J-M Barreto, brings together the work of British Critical Legal Studies, including its philosophical mentors.